Rumi Forum's blog on Hizmet, Fethullah Gulen, peacebuilding, education and interfaith efforts.

Showing posts with label dialogue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dialogue. Show all posts

Saturday, May 7, 2016

IFLC: Promoting Intercultural Dialogue





  • Turkish promote cultural exchanges
Luis Gonzalez
Nihao Mundo
Dominican Republic
In Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, there are institutions linked to "Hizmet" or "volunteer movement" better known as "Gulen Movement", by the name of the person who inspired it, Fethullah Gulen, Turkey. It is an educational, intercultural and interfaith movement, transnational, with a presence in almost every country in the world.
These institutions in the Dominican Republic, are the "Horizon Foundation" and "Galaxy International School," which unofficially represent Turkey. Mr. Tayfun Tuna that is at the forefront of these institutions, invited us to participate in one of the most significant activities in which institutions related to Gulen Movement are involved. I mean the "International Festival of Language & Culture" which began performing in 2003 with the purpose of bringing children around the world through poetry, folklore, song and dance, organizing a festival on behalf solidarity and cooperation.
In the beginning, the festival took place in Turkish local audiences, nationally, but quickly the great reception among the population and the resounding success in the country, resulted in global expansion.
The International Language and Culture Festival is a pioneer in the exaltation of cultural and linguistic exchange as an engine for creating cross-border ties of friendship.
Tolerance, respect, understanding and friendship are the values ​​pursued through this Festival, and its promotion and acquisition from an early age, using music, dance and poetry as channels to convey this message. This year, just produced the 14th edition of the festival entitled "Beautiful Colors of the World", in Washington DC USA, on Thursday, April 28, at 630pm in the majestic Hall of the Constitution. In that we had the honor to participate and intoxicates observing both the rich cultural diversity of our world, as the extraordinary talent of young students from 26 countries who displayed their culture through poetry traditions, singing and dancing in a expression of friendship and hope for the future.
On Friday April 29, we participate in a version of the Festival, a little more solemn and formal, in the lounge (ECOSOC) Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (UN) in New York, where the message was reiterated by the same young players.
In addition to the same "Gulen Movement", we could identify as organizers of these events to institutions such as the "Peace Islands Institute", which has offices in the famous Fifth Avenue in New York.
An institution, also linked to the "Gulen Movement" which was our hostess, coordinator of the agenda exhausted in Washington, New York and New Jersey, was the "Nilufer Jamaica Foundation", based in Kingston, whose Director, Eyup Ensar Ozturk, as all who have Dr. Fethullah Gulen, as a guide, is characterized by service to others.
We hope this message will continue to multiply on the planet and that we achieve world peace in diversity.Education and opportunity for cultural exchanges with young people is an excellent way, because I congratulate the organizers and promoters.







Friday, February 26, 2016

Fethullah Gulen: The real conquest is not the winning of territory but the atmosphere of peace

Fethullah Gulen, the prominent Muslim cleric, has urged people of all faiths to come together to address global conflict at the first-ever US Muslim-Catholic Dialogue Conference in San Diego, CA, which seeks to promote interfaith dialogue and mutual respect worldwide.  







Gulen was not able to attend the US Muslim-Catholic Dialogue Conference due to his poor health. His speech was read by Zeki Saritoprak, professor of Islamic studies at John Carroll University.

Below is full text of Fethullah Gulen’s message:

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Dear Dr. Anthony Cirelli,

Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi,

Dr. Sayyid Syeed,

Dr. Khurshid Khan,

Dr. Moustafa al-Qazwini,

Most Rev. Robert McElroy,

Most Rev. Donald Hanchon,

Most Rev. Barry Knestout,

I thank you for your kind invitation to make the opening remarks for the American Muslim-Catholic Dialogue Conference held at the national level for the first time this year.

That exceptional leaders from the American Muslim and Catholic communities have formed such a dialogue venue is very meaningful for the advancement of peace and tranquility in our age. I congratulate every one who has contributed to this initiative.

My health condition unfortunately doesn’t allow me to be with you in person.

However, I would like for you all to know that this invitation is very meaningful and valuable to me.

Although it may seem that the series of unfortunate events humanity has endured in recent years validate those who predicted dark scenarios in the so-called clash of civilizations framework, I have personally always been hopeful for the future of humanity.

In the shared perspective expressed in the Holy Quran and the sources of divine religions grounded in revelation, humans by nature seek the good and the beautiful.

I thoroughly believe that humankind will be attracted to the atmosphere of mutual understanding and respect, and will embrace each other. Hope is an expression of trust in God’s grace. Desperation, on the other hand, is the primary obstacle before any progress and leaves individuals crippled, unable to tap into their potential.

The Earth has never been free of those who propagate fear, hate, and enmity for various motives. Today, unfortunately, we observe examples of these individuals and groups in both the East and the West. However, undeniably, humans are tired of wars, violent conflicts, bloodshed, atrocities, and they are thirsty for universal dialogue and peace. Our globalizing world presents a historically unprecedented ground for developing affinity, integration, and mutual acceptance.

Although hostilities and conflicts in history have essentially been driven by a clash of worldly interests, sometimes nationality, class, and religion have been used as means in order to rally the masses to a certain side. In reality however, the fundamental vision of all religions that have been embraced by a significant segment of humanity, in particular, religions based on revelation, are societies whose individuals attain internal tranquility, and a world of universal peace that such societies constitute.

In the Holy Quran, eeman (faith) and amal-i-saalih (righteous deeds) are always mentioned in tandem. Amal-i Salih is the name of deeds accepted by Allah. Sulh (peace) and salih (righteous) are two words from the same root; Salih means that which leads to Sulh (or peace), and is guided by the pursuit of peace. Therefore, Islam, a religion of unity, demands his adherents to be on the path to universal peace and tranquility.

It is clear that in an atmosphere of conflict, peace cannot be served by simply opposing and reacting to the agendas of others. In this regard, at a time where core values of human civilization are cherished at least as a vision, humans, who are civilized by nature of their creation, can solve their issues only through communication facilitated by dialogue venues.

The vast majority of the world’s population adheres to Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism. In the 21st century, therefore, it is an inevitable conclusion that the universal peace will depend on the dialogue among the adherents of these religions and traditions. I have stated that initiatives for dialogue are long overdue on the occasion of our meeting with his Excellency the late Pope John Paul II in 1998.

14 centuries ago, the Holy Quran called for dialogue among Muslims, Jews, and Christians, the latter two it referred to as Ahl-Al Kitaab, or people of the book. However, in the intervening centuries periods of conflict outnumbered periods of peace due to the conditions of those times. Now, however, the following centuries should be defined by mutual respect, love, and coalescence.

By the use of the term “people of the book” the Quran is addressing not only Jews and Christians but also all individuals in contemporary society pursuing knowledge and enlightenment through reading and writing. As Bediuzzaman Said Nursi pointed out, it can be said that the people of learning and enlightenment are also invited to dialogue.

Again, the Holy Quran refers to the Hudaybiya peace treaty signed by the Muslims of Medina with the polytheist Meccans as a “conquest” as opposed to the surrender of Mecca two years later. The real conquest is not the winning of territory but the atmosphere of peace when weapons are set aside and people enter a period of peaceful co-existence and dialogue. With the Hudaybiya peace treaty, the doors to fighting were closed, and the doors to hearts were opened, and the grounds were laid for the breaking of false prejudices.

When the ideas that the Prophet Muhammad, may God’s peace and blessings be upon him, expressed in the treaty of Medina and in his farewell sermon are evaluated within their historic socio-political context, the type of civilization Islam enjoins for its adherents becomes clearer. We regard the idea of upholding the dignity of every human being, and accepting them in their respective positions as the pillars of this civilization.

The initiatives for dialogue among adherents of all world religious, especially between Muslims and Christians, taken with this consciousness are steps towards a common human civilization where peace and tranquility will reign.

If humanity’s adventure so far is any measure, it would be unrealistic to expect all conflicts on the Earth to cease anytime soon. However, it is also not wishful thinking to expect that relations among various communities around the world will become more humane, driven by access to information, the reliance on reason and the increased first-hand knowledge of each other facilitated by dialogue in our increasingly shrinking world. At the least, it is possible to localize problems and to impede their spread. The issue facing us is what we will do intentionally out of a feeling of responsibility in this context.

The ground of dialogue that you established in order for adherents of different religions to better understand each other is the reflection of the attitude of lighting a candle rather than cursing the darkness. However, this activity that you have persistently continued for 20 years is symbolically much beyond a candle and instead is praiseworthy as a lighthouse and beacon of hope.

Destruction is easy whereas construction and repair are difficult. At times, in the face of burning fires of war, atrocities, stirring of hostilities, and conflicts around the world, those working to serve peace through means such as dialogue may feel defeated and fall into pessimism. Amidst the waves of grave hostilities and conflicts humans face or partake in, one might question what our efforts may signify.

However, it should not be forgotten that there is a special value in setting a good example. Humans, who are naturally disposed to beauty, will sooner or later will take interest in these good examples, and eventually embrace them. One day they will say, “up until now we tried fighting and war, now let us give a chance to dialogue and mutual acceptance.”

There are many precedents in the history of humanity where small groups influence much larger groups with the help of the centrifugal force that they generate. In this regard, the steps taken in particular by widely respected leaders of religious thought, like your selves, are crucial.

Ever since humans have existed, the struggle between compassion, love and hope on the one hand, and fear, hate, and despair on the other has continued. Just as the essence of the messages of Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, upon whom all be God’s peace and blessings, are compassion, love, and hope, their life stories are also embodiments of those essences. Our world today is in equal, and maybe even greater, need for this message.

I congratulate again those who organized and participated in this conference as a collaboration of Muslims and Christians who are representatives of this message today and share their belief in the importance of dialogue.

I pray God the All-Compassionate to deliver humanity to those days where peace and tranquility reign in all continents of the Earth and human beings warmly embrace each other. And I ask God to accept this conference as an active prayer toward the same end.

Sincerely,

Fethullah Gulen

Friday, December 18, 2015

Fethullah Gulen's Op-ed in Le Monde: Muslims, we have to critically review our understanding of Islam






 Words fall short to truly express my deep sadness and revolt in the face of the carnage perpetrated by terrorist groups such as the so-called ISIS. I share a profound frustration with a billion and a half Muslims around the world at the fact that such groups commit terror while dressing up their perverted ideologies as religion. We Muslims have a special responsibility to not only join hands with fellow human beings to save our world from the scourge of terrorism and violent extremism, but also to help repair the tarnished image of our faith.

It is easy to proclaim a certain identity in the abstract with words and symbols. The sincerity of such claims, however, can only be measured by comparing our actions with core values of our self-proclaimed identities. The true test for belief is not slogans or dressing up in a certain way; the true test of our beliefs is in living up to core principles shared by all major world faiths such as upholding the sanctity of life and respecting the dignity of all humans.

We must categorically condemn the ideology that terrorists propagate and instead promote a pluralistic mindset with clarity and confidence. After all, before our ethnic, national or religious identity comes our common humanity, which suffers a setback each time a barbaric act is committed. French citizens who lost their lives in Paris, Shiite Muslim Lebanese citizens who lost their lives in Beirut a day earlier and scores of Sunni Muslims in Iraq who lost their lives in the hands of the same terrorists are first and foremost human beings. Our civilization will not progress until we treat the suffering of humans regardless of their religious or ethnic identity as equally tragic in our empathy and respond with the same determination.

Muslims must also reject and avoid conspiracy theories, which have so far only helped us avoid facing our social problems. Instead, we must tackle the real questions: do our communities provide recruitment ground for groups with totalitarian mindsets due to unrecognized authoritarianism within ourselves, domestic physical abuse, neglect of youth, lack of balanced education? Did our failure to establish basic human rights and freedoms, supremacy of the rule of law, and pluralist mindsets in our communities lead those who are struggling to seek alternative paths?

The recent tragedy in Paris is yet another reminder for both theologians and ordinary Muslims to strongly reject and condemn barbaric acts perpetrated in the name of our religion. However, at this juncture, rejection and condemnation are not enough; terrorist recruitment within Muslim communities must be fought and countered by an effective collaboration of state authorities, religious leaders and civil society actors. We must organize community-wide efforts to address all factors that aid terrorist recruitment.

Ways of expressing support and dissent within democratic means


We need to work with our community to set up the necessary framework for identifying at-risk youth, preventing them from seeking self-destructive paths, assisting families with counseling and other support services. We must promote a proactive, positive government engagement so that engaged Muslim citizens can sit at the table where counterterrorism measures are planned and share their ideas. Our youth should be taught ways of expressing support and dissent within democratic means. Incorporation of democratic values into school curricula early on is crucial for inculcating a culture of democracy in young minds.

In the aftermath of such tragedies, historically strong reactions have surfaced. Anti-Muslim and anti-religious sentiment as well as governments’ security-driven treatment of their Muslim citizens would be counter-productive. The Muslim citizens of Europe want to live in peace and tranquility. Despite the negative climate, they should strive to engage more with their local and national governments to help work toward more inclusive policies that better integrate their community into the larger society.

It is also important for us Muslims to critically review our understanding and practice of Islam, in the light of the conditions and requirements of our age and the clarifications provided by our collective historic experiences. This does not mean a rupture from the cumulative Islamic tradition but rather, an intelligent questioning so we can confirm the true teachings of the Qur’an and the Prophetic tradition that our Muslim predecessors attempted to reveal.

We must proactively marginalize de-contextualized reading of our religious sources that have been employed in the service of perverted ideologies. Muslim thinkers and intellectuals should encourage a holistic approach and reconsider jurisprudential verdicts of the Middle Ages that were issued under perpetual conflict where religious affiliation often coincided with political affiliation. Having core beliefs should be distinguished from dogmatism. It is possible, indeed absolutely necessary, to revive the spirit of freedom of thought that gave birth to a renaissance of Islam while staying true to the ethos of the religion. Only in such an atmosphere can Muslims effectively combat incivility and violent extremism.

In the aftermath of the recent events I witness, with chagrin, the revival of the thesis of the clash of civilizations. I do not know whether those who first put out such a hypothesis did so out of vision or desire. What is certain is that today, the revival of this rhetoric simply serves the recruitment efforts of the terrorist networks. I want to state clearly that what we are witnessing is not a clash of civilizations but rather the clash of our common civilization as humanity with barbarity.

Our responsibility as Muslim citizens is to be part of the solution despite our grievances. If we want to defend the life and civil liberties of Muslims around the world, and the peace and tranquility of every human regardless of their faith, we must act now to tackle the violent extremism problem in all its dimensions: political, economic, social and religious. By setting virtuous examples through our lives, by discrediting and marginalizing the extremist interpretations of religious sources, by staying vigilant toward their impact on our youth, and by incorporating democratic values early in education, we can counter violence and terrorism as well as totalitarian ideologies that lead to them.


This article appeared in Le Monde on December 17, 2015.

Original article can be accessed here: http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2015/12/17/musulmans-procedons-a-un-examen-critique-de-notre-comprehension-de-la-foi_4834205_3232.html

 

Thursday, August 20, 2015

Rumi Forum Organizes Ramadan Iftar Dinner for South Asian-Turkish American Communities

Members of the South Asian and Turkish American communities attended a Ramadan iftar dinner organized by the Rumi Forum and held at the American Turkish Friendship Association in Fairfax on July 1st, 2015.

Shuja Nawaz, a distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council started his remarks with the importance of Ramadan, which marks a precious holy month for all Muslims, or as Mr. Nawaz said, “God sent the Quran on this month and made it an exclamation point on the Muslim calendar.” He said that the things suggested by God must not only be confined to the one month of Ramadan but must be extended above and beyond. He stressed on the criticality of doing without on a daily basis. God chose Ramadan to make fasting and giving obligatory but the lesson that he wants to pass along to his children and grandchildren and onto others is that the lessons of life in moderation and sharing with others must not be restricted to this one month. “We assume too many things, we assume that because we have them we should eat well and take advantage of our riches on this earth but what God is reminding us in Ramadan is, I believe, living a life of moderation and then, looking after others.” For those who can afford it, weekly and monthly contributions to those in need must become a regular habit, he believes.


Another poignant remark made by Mr. Nawaz was the growing intolerance within the Muslim world towards accepting differences in points of view. He believes there seems to be a desire in the Muslim community not to compromise or not to recognize when others have a different way of observing religion. “Enforcement of religion is not religion. It is not the business of the state to impose religion or the business of fellow citizens to impose religion on you. It’s a contract between you and Allah. There shouldn’t be any other constraint or obstacle in this relationship”, he said expressing his personal views. He stressed on the vital importance for Muslims to recognize their own link with God far above reliance on official diktat and to observe the ritual rather than the real meaning of Islam, as the Prophet advised his followers. The questions he raises for himself and others during this holy month are: What kind of world do we want to create for ourselves, for the Muslims, for our children and grandchildren?

In closing Mr. Nawaz’s urged the wider audience to consider the inherent and intrinsic concepts of Islamic society, such as creating democracy instead of accepting rulers who impose their will upon the populace in the name of God. He said, “I think it is incumbent upon all Muslims, and I consider myself equally engaged in this fight, to try and speak up for the individual and the right to observe religion the way you believe it should be observed and how you interpret it from the Quran.”  

Dr. Sayyid Syeed, National Director for Interfaith and Community Alliances, one of the pioneers of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), reminded those present of the struggles and successes of the Muslim community in America. Fasting during Ramadan, the invisible act of worship that pays homage to Islamic practice, has become the most popular pillar among the new generation of Muslims in America. “It’s amazing how Muslims, men and women from coast to coast, have been able to create such a respectable, visible institution – from White House to different federal departments to governors and mayors of different cities – they are all holding Iftar parties.” Mr. Syeed says fasting enhances the spiritual aspect of ones being and every religion, by definition, has to have fasting as one of its components. Islam, particularly, elevated fasting to the status of one of the fundamental pillars of the faith. Fasting helps to build communal solidarity and provide for those in need. Ramadan has been instrumental in helping people understand the true essence of Islam.


Aisha Rahman, Executive Director of Karamah, shared a personal story that tied in with the evening’s theme of encouraging dialogue and celebrating diversity. Her father taught her the importance of recognizing her identity as a Muslim over other concerns whether it be of belonging to Sunni or Shia sect, being Urdu or Arabic speaking, or coming from different countries like Pakistan or Turkey. She takes heed to not simplify anybody’s faith, heritage or background but adds, This evening we are here to celebrate intra-cultural relationships. We may not all be Muslim. We may be coming from different nations and tribes. But God says in the Quran: “I created you unto nations and tribes so you can know one another.” And that is what we’re doing here this evening. We are knowing one another.” She believes that God’s message of creating bonds of harmony and dialogue is clear. So even if the world presents constant forces that try to divide and cause schisms between communities and within the Muslim community, it is always imperative to fight against that.


Tariq Shafi, addressing the guests on occasion of the South Asian-Turkish American Ramadan iftar, laid out the historical relationship between Pakistan and Turkey. There are several overlapping commonalities between the two communities that in culture, geopolitics, military, trade, religion, food and others. Former President Pervez Musharraf once said, ““Pakistanis have always occupied a special place in the hearts and minds of the people of Turkey.” Mr. Shafi believes that these common bonds are the building blocks to what the two countries can achieve together at the local grassroots level to promote good relations and cooperation. He presents his own ideas and hopes that Turkey and Pakistan may continue collaborating and expand, learn and reinforce ideals that make us all better citizens.
IMF’s Mumtaz Hussain spoke towards the critical value of interacting and engaging with other communities, learning different cultures and being part of each other’s lives. He addressed two main points: the importance of putting humanity over all other forms of identity and focusing on learning and education endeavors. He expressed his happiness and pride of being part of organizations like Rumi Forum and ATFA, which tirelessly promote inclusivity. Speaking of such kinds of organizations, he says, “It is shocking they don’t ask you - what’s your identity? They simply ask you: you are a human being. Not even Muslim. That’s the important thing. Their relationship is beyond that and that is humanity.” The Rumi Forum and ATFA have been organizing spaces that bring together different groups to unite and celebrate each other’s diversity. Mr. Hussain believes that this kind of inclusivity, that includes people from Muslim countries like Somalia and Azerbaijan, and also different religions, makes people feel part of a close-knit united community.

Rumi Forum and ATFA, with the help of sister organizations, runs schools in all parts of the world including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Africa etc. Their focus on learning, knowledge and education is tremendous and this is reflected in the quality of these learning institutions. Citing the personal example of his children going to one such school in Virginia, he says, “In a school where there are only 160 students, there are children representing 30 nationalities. It is a small globe within a small community of a school. The kids growing up are interacting constantly with many different cultures and communities. Imagine their learning when they grow up. They have all these assets and skills to deal and be part of the world - not part of a small group, but of the whole world. And that’s what really excites and amazes me.” In closing, Mr. Hussain reiterated the value of the work being done by inclusive societies that give precedence to human dignity, human culture and values.



Wednesday, February 18, 2015

New Book: Cross-cultural Dialogue on Virtues: The Contribution of Fethullah Gulen



The book explores the development of the influential worldwide Hizmet movement inspired by the Turkish scholar Fethullah Gülen, known for his moderate Islamic emphasis on peaceful relations among diverse people. It provides a detailed study of Gülen’s account of the virtues and argues that they provide the key to understanding this thinker and the movement he inspired, from its initial establishment of hospitality houses through the growth of worldwide schools, hospitals, media outlets, charitable associations and dialogue centers.

Image result for cross cultural dialogue trudy


The book analyzes the distinctive virtues that shaped the Hizmet movement’s ethos as well as continue to sustain its expansive energy, from the core virtues of tolerance, hospitality, compassion and charity to a host of related virtues, including wisdom, humility, mildness, patience, mercy, integrity and hope. It also examines the Islamic and Sufi roots of Gülen’s understanding of the virtues as well as presents a comparative study of Gülen’s account of the virtues in dialogue with prominent thinkers of the Western philosophical tradition and the religious traditions of Christianity, Judaism and Buddhism.

The Hizmet movement provides living witness to the power and efficacy of tolerance, dialogue and peaceful relations among diverse people. This book offers an insightful portrait of the core virtues of this movement and the scholar who fully explored them within his writing. It will appeal to readers interested in virtue ethics, character education, cross-cultural studies, interfaith dialogue and the role of moderate Islam today.



Monday, January 26, 2015

Thought & Practice Series: Gülen on Dialogue

This publication is about the thought and practice espoused and practised by Fethullah Gülen and the Hizmet movement. Fethullah Gülen is one of the most important Muslim scholars of our time for whom dialogue is not just about overcoming problems of the globalising world but is necessitated by the essence of humanity and the spirit and teachings of Islam. Therefore, dialogue is an ever-present and underlying theme for Gülen in addition to being a particular area of thought and practice that he seeks to promote and develop. What is significant about Gülen, however, is that he is not just a scholar and thinker but also a doer who has inspired millions to think and act alongside him in what has now emerged as a civil society movement known as the Hizmet movement.


This publication provides a short biography of Gülen’s life in relation to his dialogue efforts and then goes on to study the main features and characteristics of his dialogue thought such as: love, tolerance, empathetic acceptance, positive action, and humility. It then explores how Gülen’s notion of dialogue, dialogically developed and practised by the Hizmet movement, is now being put into practice in different parts of the world. The section on practice concludes with a list of the twelve ‘dialogue principles’ extrapolated from Gülen’s teachings and the Hizmet movement’s practice.

Saturday, November 30, 2013

LUNCHEON : Living Where You Don’t Make the Rules - Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool



Living Where You Don’t Make the Rules (Part I)

Faith and cultural change in the age of globalization.




This is part one of a three-part series on Muslims, faith and cultural change in the age of globalization.
One of the touchiest issues in the world today is the Muslim disquiet, especially in countries where Muslims are minorities. We often miss it and call it all kinds of names.
We call it Islamism. We call it radicalism, we call it extremism, we call it fundamentalism and we call it violence. We claim it springs from conflict-driven communities.
Those labels have a semblance of truth in them, because on any given day, some Muslims may display some of those characteristics.
But those labels don’t tell the story about what the causes of the disquiet really are. They don’t even begin to describe how to deal with it and how to manage it. In particular, they don’t tell how to bring peace to the soul of a community that is often uncomfortable in the context of the disquiet.
The existing disquiet, in turn, invites fear, suspicion and often hostility among non-Muslims. In some way, we have to tackle the issue head on. How do we deal with this problem? The way in which I have come to understand it is that the key lies in the theological assumptions of the Muslim community that were formed in times of dominance.
When Islam was an empire, when Muslims were the rulers and when they moved into Spain, they made theological assumptions about how they could live. They created the rules for how to engage with those who are non-Muslim (and how those others could live). That set the tone of the lifestyle that they could lead....

READ FULL ARTICLEhttp://bit.ly/globalistERasool

Monday, November 25, 2013

Fethullah Gulen on Political Participation


On Political Participation

Q: Nowadays some say it is imperative to support a political philosophy. What do you say?

Sometimes political participation may be imperative. Every believer should vote and participate in the decision making process regarding the general public as it is a duty of any citizen. A believer would be responsible if she or he does not fulfill this assignment. Not only that, one should also inform their parents and other close relatives about the importance of this matter.

However who should vote for what party is not my business. Throughout my life, I always found it essential to avoid not only publicly commenting on it but even making a slightest bit of an innuendo. I am not saying “Vote for this party, or do not vote for that party!” All I am saying is, “Voting is a duty for every citizen, so everyone should do their job, or otherwise they will be responsible”. That is as much as I participate in politics…

On the matter of supporting a specific party; our interest in the elections start only a week before the election date. People like us can talk among themselves and discuss what party they should vote for and then they go and vote on the Election Day. After that, they don’t discuss it a bit. In the real democratic countries this matter is handled like that. As an example, when a citizen of the US arrives at Turkey, and asked about what party he did support, “Are you a republican or a democrat?” He replies as “I don’t support either!” When asked, “Have you not voted? Who did you vote for?” he says “I voted for Kennedy, but I don’t think about the rest, as my business and interest in elections is just that, nothing more!”

As such, we have very important duties in our own life that we need to focus on. While we are doing our own job, this or that political thought should not interfere with that. This very important duty is related to our spiritual life. We mostly keep ourselves busy with that.

These principles are important for every believer. Because believers have very important duties within the domain of heart and soul; duties like performing the daily prayers regularly, cleansing one’s heart, paying close attention to one’s connection with the Almighty and considering any disconnection in that regard a fatal failure. These are continuous ongoing duties of a believer that should not ever be interrupted. But elections come only every four years. The campaigns last and get intensified within the last week. Then people vote and the fight is over. That’s what smart people do. Others, who are foolish, keep talking about after everything is over, badger others, keep singing the same tune –of disunity, and promote hatred and waste their lives in this fight.

Let’s think about the Messenger (peace be upon him). Before Uhud he recommends to stay in Medina and not go out to Uhud. In response to this, especially the youth say “No lets go out and fight and stop them all!” The results of the consultation come out as the way the young wanted. They all go out to Uhud, but right before the fight, the hypocrites leave the front. At this point anyone in the position of the Messenger could have got mad. Although he never gets mad about that, the Almighty warns the believers in the Holy Quran (3:159) “It was by a mercy from God that (at the time of the setback), you (O Messenger) were lenient with them (your Companions). Had you been harsh and hard-hearted, they would surely have scattered away from about you. Then pardon them, pray for their forgiveness, and take counsel with them in the affairs (of public concern); and when you are resolved (on a course of action), put your trust in God. Surely God loves those who put their trust (in Him).” This is the way taught to the Messenger (peace be upon him). Now we should evaluate our own situation accordingly and try to understand what I am trying to say in my above comments.

This is a partial translation of an excerpt “Siyasete Bakis” from Cizgimizi Hecelerken by Fethullah Gulen.


SOURCE: Who is Fethullah Gulenhttp://whoisgulen.com/on-political-particapation/

See also Suggested Links:


Monday, August 26, 2013

NEW BOOK: Dialogue Theories



Dialogue Theories gives an accessible introduction to the ideas of ten thinkers who have made insightful contributions to thought on dialogue, from quantum physicist David Bohm, to social theorist Jürgen Habermas, to Islamic scholar and peace advocate Fethullah Gülen.

This book aims to advance theoretical and practical engagement with dialogue by introducing the work of ten individuals who have made important and insightful contributions to thought in this area. The thinkers selected come from diverse fields, from religious studies and interfaith dialogue, through philosophy and social theory, to communication studies, public opinion analysis and even quantum physics.

A great deal of hope seems to be pinned on ‘dialogue’ in the contemporary world. The word is regularly raised in the context of a range of pressing issues, from the need for intercultural understanding in a globalised world, to the economic and ecological crises crying out for creative, collaborative responses, to the political process of policy and law-making at both national and international levels. Dialogue would thus seem to merit serious reflection and experimentation. The thinkers considered in this volume are among those who have afforded it this kind of attention.

This introduction to their work is intended to inform and inspire anyone with an interest in the meaning, value and potential of dialogue, particularly those engaged with dialogue in a professional, academic, voluntary or personal capacity. No background knowledge is assumed. It is hoped that in these pages readers will discover inspiring new thinkers to engage with, and perhaps new facets to more familiar thinkers. The book also includes discussion of a wide range of practical dialogue organisations and projects which may provide further food for thought and ideas for practice.



Sunday, August 25, 2013

THE CHAUTAUQUAN DAILY: Saritoprak shares knowledge of Turkish traditions and Gülen movement

BRIAN SMITH | STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER
Zeki Saritoprak, the Nursi Chair of Islamic Studies at John Carroll University, speaks about his homeland of Turkey during an Interfaith Lecture in the Hall of Philosophy at the Chautauqua Institution.

by FREDO VILLASEÑOR

Zeki Saritoprak is the Nursi Chair in Islamic Studies at John Carroll University. At 2 p.m. Friday in the Hall of Philosophy, he delivered an Interfaith Lecture on the Gülen movement and on Turkish culture and religion. Saritoprak is a contributing author of Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement, edited by Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito.

Before discussing Gülen and his Hizmet movement, Saritoprak gave a brief outline of Turkish history, from the start of the Ottoman Empire to the founding of the Republic of Turkey. He spoke on how Islam appeared in Turkey and on the religiosity of modern Turkish people.

Gülen became a prominent Turkish preacher and imam in the 1980s, Saritoprak said. People would come from hundreds of miles away to hear him speak. Gülen’s Hizmet movement is the largest civic movement in the world today, Saritoprak said.

Gülen has been successful in encouraging Turkish Muslims to establish and attend secular schools.

“Muslims have to establish … not religious schools, but just regular, secular high schools,” Saritoprak said, “because [Gülen believes] mathematics is talking about God, physics is talking about God, chemistry is talking about God.”

Among Gülen’s critics are Turks who feel he is not enough of a nationalist, Saritoprak said. Because of Gülen’s emphasis on interfaith dialogue and his connections with leaders of other religious traditions, some Muslims have accused him of secretly being a rabbi or a cardinal.

The Hizmet movement has opened its own schools to promote peace, nonviolence and tolerance, with at least 1,000 schools in Turkey and in more than 40 other countries, Saritoprak said.

“In the generation that [is being] educated in these schools … I think we have a good promise of our future,” he said.

He noted that the Hizmet movement has also opened hospitals and has been involved in relief efforts; for example, those in Haiti and New Orleans. The movement’s newspaper is one of the most widely read in Turkey, Saritoprak said.

Gülen has held meetings with figures such as the chief rabbis of Israel and Pope John Paul II, and he is generally respected among the Jewish and Christian communities for bringing Muslims into dialogue with those of other faiths, Saritoprak said.

“I think the most visible part — and sometimes criticized part — of this movement is interfaith dialogue,” Saritoprak said.


Tuesday, August 13, 2013

NEW BOOK: Beginnings and Endings: Fethullah Gulen's Vision for Today's World


Walter Wagner attempts to present a framework of understanding that outlines the philosophy and theology of Fethullah Gulen, a worldwide known scholar of Islam who inspired a global movement of education and interfaith dialogue. This book shows how Gülen's vision for the present and future makes the present and future forms of Hizmet an essential part of his wider and urgent call for the formation of a community of religiously committed and non-religiously committed persons to work toward a just, equitable and prosperous world now.

About the Author:
Dr. Walter H. Wagner is adjunct faculty at Moravian Theological Seminary (Bethlehem, PA) and the Lutheran Theological Seminary, Philadelphia. He is an ordained Lutheran pastor (ELCA), retired from parish ministry. He has taught at California, Lutheran College, Upsala College and Muhlenberg College, and served as the director for theological education of the Lutheran Church in America. He is the author of a number of articles on early church history and Islam as well as Opening the Qur'an.



More Info: http://www.amazon.com/Beginnings-Endings-Fethullah-Gulens-Vision/dp/1935295268

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Strategic Defamation of Fethullah Gulen: Turkish vs. English - Dr. Dogan Koc

Strategic Defamation of Fethullah Gulen: Turkish vs. English - Dr. Dogan Koc


Who is Gulen? Fethullah Gülen is a moderate Turkish Muslim scholar who is known mostly for his education and dialogue activities. The Hizmet Movement, inspired by Gülen, has established hundreds of education and dialogue institutions throughout the world. Several books and hundreds of articles and news reports have been written about Gülen himself and the movement. In recent years, a defamation campaign has been launched against Gülen and the Hizmet Movement. Although these defamation articles may seem random, this book shows that the articles are written strategically in a campaign manner. In Strategic Defamation of Fethullah Gülen, close to 500 defamation articles, books, and other forms of writings are analyzed according to their languages. Koç concludes that these defamations differ from each other and appear according to their respective audiences.

Dogan Koc is the executive director of the Gulen Institute at the University of Houston. Before his work at the institute, Dr. Koc worked at the Cairo University as a visiting scholar, and taught at the Austin College in Sherman, TX. He received his PhD degree in Political Science from the University of Texas at Dallas. Dr. Koc also holds degrees in chemistry, education, and sociology. In his studies, he focuses on conflict resolution, international relations, and social movements. He conducted one of the first and most extensive quantitative researches on Turkey's Kurdish conflict, in which he analyzes the strategies of military, government and civil society applied in the resolution of the conflict. He is also the author of the recent book "Strategic Defamation of Fethullah Gulen: Turkish vs. English."